#2560x1080 resolution calculator 1080p
#2560x1080 resolution calculator drivers
#2560x1080 resolution calculator full

All games were run at presets defined in their respective charts. Game settings were manually controlled for the DUT.

#2560x1080 resolution calculator drivers

NVidia's 361.75 drivers were used for testing the latest games. The latest AMD drivers (16.1.1 hotfix) were used for testing. Our thanks to supporting hardware vendors for supplying some of the test components. We tested using our 2015 multi-GPU test bench.

#2560x1080 resolution calculator full

A full review of the 34вЂќ Acer Predator UltraWide (curved) is forthcoming, but for now, let's get to the benchmarks. There are few technologies that really impress us, and as simple as it seems, just growing the display to 21:9 is one of those experience-improving changes. Racing games and flight games, like DiRT and Star Citizen, offer greater peripheral vision that is both immersive and mechanically advantageous shooters like Black Ops III and Battlefront (where FOV is user-controlled) reveal more of the player's flanks without the introduction of a bezel, as experienced with multi-monitor setups. So it's not perfect вЂ“ but a lot of games do work well with UltraWides. Shadow of Mordor has an odd, slight stretch that adds some weight to Talion. Dirty Bomb is a good example of a game that didn't seem to support 3440x1440 when we tested its beta.

Older titles and indie titles are the two most common detractors вЂ“ understandably, given (1) old or (2) smaller teams which may overlook the resolutions вЂ“ but competitive games can sometimes intentionally forbid UltraWide resolutions. Some games are not supported on UltraWide resolutions. We've included a few screenshots throughout this benchmark that provide a better understanding of how an UW display impacts the gaming experience. Some Notes & Impressions on UltraWide Monitors That should give some perspective on performance for various display formats. The most common 4K resolution (3840x2160) pushes ~8.3 million pixels, making it more intensive on the GPU than lower-resolution 3440x1440 UltraWides. That plants the 3440x1440 UW resolution noticeably higher in pixel count than both these 16:9 go-to resolutions, meaning gaming performance will be reduced by nature of increased pixel throughput.

#2560x1080 resolution calculator 1080p

Comparatively, 1080p (1920x1080) produces about 2 million pixels, with 1440p (2560x1440) producing ~3.7 million pixels. Pixel count for a 3440x1440 resolution display is ~4.9 million. For anyone considering 2560x1080 GPU performance, check out our Game Benchmarks page and note that your performance will be slightly better than our 1440p charts (2560x1440). Production users are most obviously benefited by such a display.

This isn't a resolution we test, but it does offer a middle-ground of affordability for folks who really can't run two side-by-side, higher resolution displays. Some $300 options run 2560x1080 to help reduce cost. The UltraWide GPU performance benchmark includes the GTX 980 Ti, 980, 970, and 960 from nVidia and the R9 390X, 380X, 290X, and 285 from AMD.ДЈ440x1440 isn't the only UltraWide resolution out there.

Today, we're benchmarking graphics card FPS on a 3440x1440 Acer Predator 34вЂќ UltraWide monitor. Increased pixel throughput more heavily saturates the pipeline, of course, which means that standard 1080p and 1440p benchmarks won't reflect the true video card requirements of a 3440x1440 UltraWide display. These UltraWide displays afford greater production capabilities by effectively serving the role of two side-by-side displays, just with no bezel they also offer greater desk compatibility, more easily centered atop smaller real-estate.ДЇor gaming, the UltraWide argument is two-fold: Greater immersion with a wider, more вЂњfullвЂќ space, and greater peripheral vision in games which may benefit from a wider field of view. UltraWide displays run a 21:9 aspect ratio (21 pixels across for every 9 pixels down, think of it like run/rise), a noticeable difference from the 16:9 of normal widescreens. Today, we've got вЂњUltraWides,вЂќ much like we've got вЂњUltra HDвЂќ вЂ“ and whatever else has the U-word thrown in front of it вЂ“ and they're no gimmick. Modern displays don't really get called вЂњwidescreenвЂќ anymore there's no point вЂ“ they're all wide. 144Hz has subsumed 120Hz, both sort-of вЂњpremiumвЂќ frequencies, and adaptive synchronization technologies G-Sync and FreeSync have further complicated the monitor buying argument.Д«ut we think the most interesting, recent trend is to do with aspect ratios. 1080p lost its luster as 1440p emerged, and later 4K вЂ“ which still hasn't quite caught on вЂ“ and that's to say nothing of the frequency battles. Monitors have undergone a revolution over the past few years.